The main challenges same sex marriages face include inability to participate in medical decisions that involve their partner who are dying, lack of right to own common property and exclusion from employment benefits.
Many refer to activities well underway, such as programmes in parishes, seminars and retreats for couples. These aspects are exerting influence even in countries with traditional family cultures which seem, until now, to have exercised great resistance in the matter Africa, Middle East and South-Central Asia.
Consequently, the natural law is perceived as an outdated legacy. The lack of a father-figure in many families causes major imbalances in households and uncertainty in gender identification in children. The contrary is true in strongly secularized areas, where, in certain cultures, couples are distancing themselves more and more from Church teaching.
In these areas, some bishops' conferences argue that it is not difficult to integrate Church teaching on the family with the social and moral values present in these cultures. A same-sex couple in a civil union is denied the all of the rights that come with marriage.
Accumulation of knowledge is a process that involves sensory input together with innate cognitive response. In this regard, many respondents relate that the legal systems in many countries are having to make laws on situations which are contrary to the traditional dictates of the natural law for example, in vitro fertilization, homosexual unions, the manipulation of human embryos, abortion, etc.
Proponents and gays movement fight for legal right to marriage in order to ensure that all citizens enjoy full human rights. The demise of the concept of the natural law tends to eliminate the interconnection of love, sexuality and fertility, which is understood to be the essence of marriage.
On the other hand, a pure "a priori" represents knowledge that is devoid of any empirical origins. If A knows that B is necessarily true then A knows "a priori" that B.
As gay couples cannot physically reproduce, they have no reason to marry. As a result, the church is against the legalization of gay marriages because it can be viewed by the society as promoting homosexually in the society.
On the other hand, if gay marriages are granted the legal rights this might be a threat to the stability of the traditional meaning of family. Economic benefits that the proponents of gay marriages cite include increased revenue as a result of additional marriages through marriage taxes Stockland In places with a vibrant Christian tradition and a well-organized pastoral programme, people are responsive to the Christian doctrine on marriage and the family.
The rules governing marriage have also been used to exclude those outside the dominant culture in order to subjugate them. They further believe that marriage would no longer have the same meaning if homosexual couples find alternative methods of having children Nagle A culture based on the senses and immediate gratification is also having an influence.
Some offer alternative analyses of the concept and argue that the alleged examples of "a priori" knowledge do not satisfy the conditions in the analysis. On the other hand, many respondents confirmed that, even when the Church's teaching about marriage and the family is known, many Christians have difficulty accepting it in its entirety.
Their members offer a credible witness with their lives of fidelity in marriage, mutual respect, unity and openness to life. For my research paper, I challenged myself to write it about why same-sex marriage should not be legalized.
After three days of research, I regret to inform you that, with the information I found, there is no logical reason whatsoever that same-sex couples should not be able to get married/5(2). This paper will begin by looking briefly at the changing nature of marriage and the family structure in order to discuss the concept of marriage between two people of the same sex.
Ten Arguments From Social Science Against Same-Sex Marriage By Family Research Council.
A large and growing body of scientific evidence indicates that the intact, married family is best for children.
In just a few weeks, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of same-sex marriage in America and roll out the implications of that ruling for individual states. I expect the ruling to create an alleged constitutional right to same-sex marriage, contrary to God’s created orders, natural law and the inerrant Scriptures.
Marriage Equality. The Australian Human Rights Commission considers that the fundamental human rights principle of equality means that civil marriage should be available, without discrimination, to all couples, regardless of sex, sexual orientation or gender identity.
Truth will out in the end. Despite the handful of small dubious studies that portray same-sex parenting as 'just as good' as natural parenting, larger properly constructed studies say otherwise.Same sex marriage research paper conclusion